» from archive
Issues In The Proof That P≠NP « Gödel’s Lost Letter and P=NP -
2010-08-11 08:59:43 GMT
Still there remains the key question: is the proof correct? In one sense the present paper almost surely has mistakes—not just from the above objections but what one could expect of any first-draft in a breakthrough situation. The real questions are, is the proof strategy correct, and are the perceived gaps fixable?
Best of Mokum